Macbeth
Macbeth
Citizens Theatre, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
PERFORMED in English in Andrew Porter's translation, Verdi's way with Shakespeare perhaps seems more like the Bard than it actually is, with some lines in the libretto very familiar indeed.
Dominic Hill's production, however, is sensitive to the interpretive differences that the composer added in his version of the tale, and which led to some criticism (and Verdi's typically bolshie defence) a century and a half ago.
With much lighting of candles at crucial points, chief among these is the pitting of the pagan witches (hedonistic goth girls, nicely choreographed for the opening scene by Kally Lloyd-Jones, and pantomimic in the kitchen scene at the start of Act Three) against a Catholic God, and Macbeth's rule portrayed as a time of the collapse of civilised society with the man himself reduced to despair before the death of his wife, never mind his eventual defeat.
It is a rather misogynistic take on the tale, Elisabeth Meister's Lady Macbeth explicitly culpable in leading the man to his murders, although this demon undoubtedly has all the best tunes - and she makes the most of them.
Her glorious singing, one of four Scottish Opera debuts among a cast of just seven, with fine voices also including Thomas Faulkner's Banquo and Anthony Flaum's Macduff, stands out because she has the lion's share of the set pieces in a work where Verdi was pioneering a new style of story-driven music theatre.
The tension that creates between the demands of the music and those of the drama can present problems, but Hill's modern-dress staging and Derek Clark's conducting of an 18-piece chamber ensemble, adapting the director's smaller touring version in 2005, makes light of them.
If the compromises of the restricted company sometimes show in the stage pictures, the music emerges pretty much unscathed, with some lovely ensemble work, particularly the sextet at the end of Act Two.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article