Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

The Met’s ‘Ring’ After Oiling

Bryn Terfel as Wotan and Deborah Voigt as Brünnhilde in  "Die Walküre" at the Metropolitan Opera.Credit...Ken Howard/Metropolitan Opera

No more sliding god entrances. Siegmund and Sieglinde move their intimate moments closer to the audience. And the creaking quotient has been reduced.

Through May 12 the Metropolitan Opera is mounting three complete cycles of the four operas that make up Richard Wagner’s “Ring des Nibelungen.” After performances of the individual works over the last two seasons, the director, Robert Lepage, has made changes throughout.

In a recent interview in a small, unadorned office at the Met, Mr. Lepage detailed some of those changes and responded to the criticism that has dogged his “Ring”: part of the scrutiny typical of productions of such a singular work with so many passionate followers.

Mr. Lepage said that now, after focusing on each opera individually, he can more easily envision the whole “Ring,” more than 15 hours of music drama. “If you see each increment, they all mean something different,” he said. “But when you see them as a package, it’s like connecting Christmas tree lights. Suddenly the energy of one bleeds into the other, and a lot of stuff starts to make sense. For me, that was interesting, how the whole thing shines.”

Mr. Lepage said that he had restaged “a lot of stuff” for the cycle, but that the changes amounted mostly to details. He gave examples:

In Wotan’s monologue in Act II of “Die Walküre,” a giant projected eye contained images evoking later events. Those images have been made more specific, Mr. Lepage said, using elements from the productions that followed. “It’s all now much clearer and closer to the story,” he said. “It accompanies very specifically what Wotan sings about.”

During the long scene between Siegmund and Sieglinde in “Die Walküre,” the couple now spend more time toward the front of the stage. “You want them to be more present,” Mr. Lepage said. The Met’s principal conductor, Fabio Luisi, who took over when the music director James Levine withdrew for health reasons, became involved in decisions on how to move the characters around, Mr. Lepage said, adding, “It’s a more surgical approach.”

Image
Bryn Terfel in “Das Rheingold,” at the Met Opera.Credit...Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

In the original “Rheingold” gods made entrances by sliding down a slanted portion of the giant set, which has 24 revolving planks on an axle that can rise and fall. Now they simply walk onstage. “It wasn’t working,” Mr. Lepage said.

The production makes heavy use of projections, creating flowing rivers, trees, squirmy worms and other elements. Sometimes the projections could be seen on the singers’ bodies. Simply repositioning the follow spotlights helped wash away those unwanted reflections, Mr. Lepage said.

Other factors are having an effect on cycle performances, he added. The sheer time spent on the huge machine has made the singers more comfortable and creates a greater sense of ease on the stage. Bryn Terfel, the Wotan, has lost around 30 pounds. His changed appearance had to be taken into consideration, Mr. Lepage said.

A slimmer Wotan looks younger, which is more fitting with the character in “Rheingold,” who has an element of the philandering husband. “The Wotan he does in ‘Rheingold’ looks much younger and hunkier,” Mr. Lepage said of Mr. Terfel, “so the whole aging of the character comes into play” through the next three operas, he said.

Mr. Lepage also said measures had been taken to deal with one of the production’s main flaws: the groaning and grinding of the 45-ton set as it transforms into different configurations. Less quiet moments in the score were found for its manipulations. Stagehands also figured out how to move it in a way to reduce noise.

“Everybody who has worked on the show has learned how to control that monster,” Mr. Lepage said. “The first test flights are way behind us, and the whole thing is well oiled, in all senses of the word. Everyone who steps on it is much calmer and knows the limits of the machinery. The crew here has a much better command of the whole concept than at the beginning. It was kind of a U.F.O. that landed in a very traditional opera house.”

The set became a lightning rod for critics of the production, who said it overpowered the characters and distracted from the music. Mr. Lepage called condemnation of the set part of “a false debate,” given that the idea of a giant transforming set has been used elsewhere. At the Met, he said, “the times will catch up with that concept.”

“People are very protective,” he added of Met audiences.

He defended the set’s size as appropriate to the vast environs of the house. “You’re in a place where things have to be huge and echo what the singers are trying to convey,” he said.

Video
Video player loading
The director Robert Lepage narrates a look at his high-tech production at the Metropolitan Opera.

Negative comments about the large set often come from people focused only on the music, Mr. Lepage said, adding that he was also trying to cater to those “who love the spectacle of opera, who love the magnifying of the ideas you can’t see in the eyes of the singer.”

He continued: “But you have a bunch of purists who say, ‘We don’t want those people because they don’t know what opera is.’ I don’t refute what specialists say, but I also have to entertain 4,000 people. It’s all about storytelling.”

He said that cranky operagoers who sit “with the score on their laps” and never look up hear a creak in the set, “and they get all——” Mr. Lepage finished the sentence with a lemon-sucking face. “These people — go see a concert version of the ‘Ring.’ ”

Mr. Lepage acknowledged flaws in his “Ring” but said there was also “a lot of great stuff.”

He said a major aim of his staging was to strip away modern interpretations.

“The first ‘Ring’ in Bayreuth was about the poetical world, the mythological world,” he said. In many recent productions the “Ring,” is “always dipped in these layers and layers of socio-political stances,” he added. “People in Europe have to try to get even with Wagner: ‘He said all these wrong things about the Jewish people in his days. One of his greatest fans is Hitler.’ We know all that. Europe is trying to get even with him.

“I said: ‘That’s all your stuff. Let’s strip all of that from the 20th century and go back to the 19th century.’ ”

Peter Gelb, the Met’s general manager, is bringing Mr. Lepage back for at least two future productions, Thomas Adès’s “Tempest” and Messiaen’s “St. François d’Assise.”

“You’re stuck with me whether you like it or not,” Mr. Lepage said good-naturedly as he walked out of the room and headed to rehearsal.

The first “Ring” cycle ends Tuesday with “Götterdämmerung”; “Das Rheingold begins on Thursday; Metropolitan Opera House, Lincoln Center, (212) 362-6000, metoperafamily.org.

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section C, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: The Met’s ‘Ring’ After Oiling. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT