|
Die Frau ohne
Schatten
Vienna State Opera
This is probably
the most controversial production that the Vienna State Opera has
seen in recent times - the action transported by Robert Carsen onto
a Freudian plane in which the Empress' inability to bear children
(symbolized by her inability to cast a shadow) is put down to a
guilt complex which was caused by circumstances surrounding the
death of her father. I happen to favour the approach, and find the
"alter ego" interaction between the Empress and the Dyer's Wife
(implied through costume and stage work) a moving and enhancing
facet, despite the occasional conflict between word and logic. Masterful
staging, whether or not you like the concept!
The cast is,
in great part, new in this revival.
Cheryl Studer,
singing the Kaiserin in this production for the first time presents
a large-scale and vibrant portrayal. Her very distinctive timbre
and her use of words create a special "presence" which lingers in
the memory well after the performance. Jon Frederic West brings
stentorian tone to the Kaiser and negotiates the role's testing
tessitura with apparent ease. Franz Grundheber is one of those rare
singers who always seems to perfectly mould his talent as a singing-actor
to suit the role - whether it's Iago, Telramund - or Barak. A fabulous
performance! While Luna deVol, as the Dyer's Wife managed to create
a believable figure, I found her hectoring vocal approach with its
wayward vibrato rather tiresome. Ildiko Szönyi was a solid Amme.
The smaller roles were all strongly cast with some quite heavenly
"unborn" tones making their contribution to the evening. Judging
by the applause, Peter Schneider (conductor) and the orchestra was
the stars of the evening. There were certainly many stirring moments
- but alas not the magical ones which have thankfully been preserved
on the old live recordings from this house with Böhm and Karajan
at the helm.
I spoke with
Cheryl Studer, and she had this to say about the Vienna production.
"There are a lot of things that work for my character - on the other
hand a lot of things that don't work. One of the things I dislike
very much is when we talk about various requisites that should be
part of the actions and reactions and we just don't have them to
work with. While there are new ideas that he (Carsen) was able to
bring out, it's like many of these contemporary versions of opera
Regie - and that is it's almost like a kind of a study. I'd like
to have these kind of things done at university level, so that everyone
gets different kinds of insights to the piece. But by the time we
get to the professional level I think we should bring the pieces
the way the composer and the librettist - who really knew what they
wanted - (intended). I think we should stick at least to some degree
to their wishes. For example Wagner and Strauss really gave so much
detail - and it's not that I'm against new ideas - but I think they
should be done in a very careful way. And I think one of the problems
we're running into now is that we've changed things and turned things
over for the last - I don't know how many years…since the Felsenstein
school. In a way we're almost getting tired of that now because
that's almost a routine - seeing everything done in a sterile way
….people coming on with their attache´cases and dressed up like
doctors…this kind of thing. In a way that's becoming normal and
now we're getting tired of it and people are going back to period
costumes and saying "Wow, that's something new and something special!"
|